Now Reading
The Laws of Divine Retraction

The Laws of Divine Retraction

DR. Srabani Basu
Indra’s Grand Celestial Academy

In the hallowed halls of Indra’s Grand Celestial Academy, a divine scandal shakes the academic world as Indra’s latest research faces retraction. With Saraswati leading a crackdown on questionable celestial publications, gods debate ethics, peer review, and the very foundations of omniscient knowledge.

“Asadoma Sadgamaya tamasoma Jyotirgamaya….” Surya dev hummed as he drove past the luxurious Swarovski crystal like mansions of the slumbering celestial deities in the divine world. He was pretty sure that Devraj would be happily sleeping after a night full of heady revelry. Suddenly he heard the soul stirring sound of the veena followed by a mellifluous chanting in a female voice, “Tad viddhi praipātena paripraśnena sevayā, upadekyanti te jñāna jñāninastattvadarśina. (True knowledge comes through humility, inquiry, and service.”) He knew it instantly that it was none other than Saraswati’s god child, who just returned from Bhulok, engaged in her ritualistic riyaz.

He was lost in the rays of melody for quite some time and then suddenly it dawned on him that he was heading for an important event. He pressed his accelerator to reach the venue on time. When he reached his destination, astonishment engulfed him. They have already arrived before him! There was a lot of commotion in progress.

In the ethereal halls of Indra’s Grand Celestial Academy, where deities gathered to debate the fundamental mysteries of existence over cups of ambrosia-infused chai, an unprecedented scandal had erupted…

“Retracted?” Indra bellowed, his voice echoing through the golden corridors. “I have never retracted anything in my life! Except, of course, that one time I promised the monsoon on time.”

The council of divine reviewers, adorned in academic robes that shimmered like the cosmos itself, looked nervously at each other. Saraswati, the goddess of wisdom and chief editor of The Celestial Journal of Omniscience, adjusted her luminous glasses and cleared her throat.

“My Lord Indra, your paper, ‘Cloud Engineering and the Ethical Dilemmas of Selective Rainfall Distribution’ has been found to contain… certain inaccuracies.”

“Inaccuracies? Impossible!” Indra slammed his thunderbolt on the divine oak table, sending a few minor sages scrambling for cover. “That research took me an entire yuga! I even cited myself in fourteen different places!”

“Yes, we noticed,” muttered Yama, the god of death and head of research ethics. “But regrettably, it has come to our attention that your experiments lacked a control group.”

“A control group?” Indra scoffed. “This is celestial research! The only control group I acknowledge is the one where I control everything.”

Saraswati sighed. “We also found that several of your peer reviewers were your own incarnations under different names. We have a Vishwajit Indra, an Indra Devajit, and, rather creatively, an ‘I. Thunderbolt.’”

“I assure you, my reviews were rigorous,” Indra said, flipping his golden hair. “I rejected my own paper twice before accepting it. Can we say the same of Vishnu’s ‘Multidimensional Avatars: A Practical Guide to Being Everywhere at Once’?”

Vishnu, reclining on a celestial couch, waved a dismissive hand. “Unlike you, I actually exist in multiple forms at once. My methodology is flawless.”

Before Indra could launch a counterattack, a messenger stormed into the hall, breathless. “Breaking news! Lord Brahma’s ‘Creation Hypothesis’ is also under review for ethical violations!”

The entire assembly gasped. Brahma, looking rather sheepish, adjusted his four faces as he fumbled with his divine scrolls. “Now, now, let’s not be hasty. What’s the issue?”

“Well,” said Yama, scanning the complaint, “there are allegations of data fabrication.”

Brahma blinked. “Excuse me?”

“Your paper states that creation was done in a single burst of cosmic brilliance, but recent replications show it was more of a gradual, trial-and-error process over multiple epochs. We found evidence of beta versions of reality: one with three suns, another where gravity was optional…”

Brahma sighed. “Fine, I may have… smoothed out the timeline for readability.”

“Additionally,” Yama continued, “there’s a claim that your methodology lacked reproducibility. Shiva attempted to follow your process but ended up with a universe full of dancing snakes.”

Shiva, twirling his trident, grinned. “And it was fabulous.”

Saraswati shook her head. “This calls into question the entire celestial peer review system. We must enforce higher standards.”

“Oh, come now,” Indra grumbled. “If we start applying rigorous standards, half the divine publications will collapse! When was the last time anyone properly replicated Narada’s ‘Effects of Random Gossip on Societal Stability’?”

Narada, looking deeply offended, strummed his veena. “I’ll have you know my work is the most cited in the cosmos! If anything, my results have been too reproducible.”

The gods nodded solemnly. Narada’s research had, indeed, led to centuries of celestial melodrama.

Just then, an assistant entered carrying a golden tablet. “We have received a withdrawal request from Rishi Vashishta. He wishes to retract his paper on ‘The Infinity of Time’ because he no longer has the patience to prove it.”

Saraswati sighed, rubbing her temples. “This is getting out of hand. We must implement reform.”

See Also
Sirens and Screens

Indra pouted. “Fine. But I demand a celestial committee on fair retraction policies. I nominate myself as chair, co-chair, and lead investigator.”

“Denied,” said Saraswati, scribbling notes. “But we will draft new guidelines. All authors must declare conflicts of interest, provide raw data, and refrain from reviewing their own papers under pseudonyms.”

“Savage,” Indra muttered, looking at his half-written manuscript, ‘Why I Am the Most Handsome God: A Meta-Analysis.’

Brahma groaned. “This is why I preferred the early cosmos. No journals, no citations, just pure, unregulated creation.”

Shiva laughed. “Yes, but without standards, we’d be stuck with Indra’s ‘Great Deluge’ theory, which was basically ‘let’s flood everything and see what survives.’”

“It was a pilot study!” Indra snapped.

Saraswati raised a hand. “Enough. From now on, the Grand Celestial Academy will uphold the highest standards of academic integrity.”

The gods murmured in discontent but ultimately nodded. As the council adjourned, Vishnu whispered to Shiva, “I give it three eons before we’re back to ‘peer-reviewing’ our own incarnations.”

Shiva smirked. “Two eons, max.” And this time we will nominate Vignesh as a co editor to ensure diversity or else it becomes a bit one sided with Saraswati dictating all terms and conditions.

Saraswati raised an eyebrow. “Oh, of course. Because the god who once wrote an entire scripture without pausing for tea is known for moderation.”

Ganesha, overhearing, munched on a modak and grinned. “Fine, but I want final say on all research involving rats, elephants, and celestial snacks.”

And thus, as the golden sun of the celestial realm set over Indra’s Grand Celestial Academy, the gods returned to their ambrosia-laden desks, ready to find new, divine loopholes in their ever-evolving world of academic publishing. Meanwhile, Narada had already started spreading whispers of a new study titled ‘The Impact of Divine Nepotism on Eternal Bureaucracy.’

Disclaimer: This is a work of fiction. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, divine or actual events is purely coincidental and unintentional.

What's Your Reaction?
Excited
0
Happy
0
In Love
0
Not Sure
0
Silly
0
View Comments (0)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Scroll To Top