Buddhist Leaders Decry Auction of Piprahwa Gems
Buddhist scholars and monastic leaders condemn Sotheby’s auction of the sacred Piprahwa gems in Hong Kong, calling it a colonial-era desecration of relics believed to be imbued with the Buddha’s presence.
In a move that has ruffled more than a few monastic feathers, Sotheby’s upcoming auction in Hong Kong of the Piprahwa gems — ancient relics believed by many Buddhists to be imbued with the spiritual presence of the Buddha himself — has sparked an outcry from Buddhist scholars, monastic leaders, and cultural custodians across the globe.
The auction, scheduled for next week, features a dazzling array of amethysts, garnets, pearls, gold, coral and rock crystals, unearthed in 1898 by British engineer William Claxton Peppé on his estate in Piprahwa, now in Uttar Pradesh, India. The items were originally buried alongside what are widely believed to be the cremated remains of Siddhartha Gautama — the Buddha — in a 3rd-century BC stupa, and were meant to remain enshrined, untouched, in perpetuity. That they are now being paraded under the hammer in Hong Kong, with an expected sale price nudging HK$100 million, has left many aghast.
“This isn’t just flogging off a few shiny trinkets,” said Professor Ashley Thompson of SOAS University of London, a renowned authority on Southeast Asian art. “These are sacred objects, relics no less, severed from the ashes of the Buddha in an act of colonial arrogance and now being sold like antique silverware.”
The transaction, critics argue, is not simply a matter of commerce — it’s the continuation of a long and uncomfortable legacy of colonial plunder. The British Crown, invoking the Indian Treasure Trove Act of 1878, laid claim to Peppé’s discovery. A portion of the relics was sent to the King of Siam; the rest were distributed between colonial institutions, with Peppé himself keeping about a fifth — a fifth now resurfacing in this controversial sale.
“For devout Buddhists, these relics are not inanimate curios,” said Professor Thompson. “They are living embodiments of the Buddha’s presence. The bones, the ash, the Piprahwa gems — they were buried together for a reason. Splitting them up was sacrilege. Auctioning them off is rubbing salt into a very old wound.”
Venerable Dr Yon Seng Yeath, abbot of Wat Unnalom and senior figure in Cambodia’s Mahanikaya order, echoed these sentiments, calling the auction “an affront to global Buddhism” and a blatant disregard for sacred heritage. “These treasures belong with the communities who hold them sacred — not in the pockets of private collectors,” he remarked.
Adding to the growing chorus, Mahinda Deegalle, emeritus professor and senior Buddhist monk, described the sale as “appalling” and a “humiliation of one of the greatest thinkers the world has ever known”.
However, the current custodians of the gems — descendants of William Claxton Peppé — hold a rather different view. Chris Peppé, a film director based in Los Angeles and great-grandson of the original excavator, insists that Buddhist scholars may be overstating their case. “None of the temples or experts I’ve consulted over the last decade regarded these as corporeal remains,” he said. “We explored donation, but it was fraught with difficulty. The auction is simply the most transparent and equitable way to transfer them into the hands of Buddhists.”
His rationale, however, has been met with scepticism. Many argue that transparency cannot be the fig leaf for what they see as a deeply unethical act. “Putting a price tag on relics of the Enlightened One is not transparency — it’s sacrilege dressed up as salesmanship,” said one Buddhist leader who preferred to remain unnamed.
Indeed, the broader ethical quandary here revolves around ownership and restitution. As the cultural repatriation debate continues to simmer — from the Elgin Marbles in the British Museum to the Benin Bronzes — the Piprahwa relics highlight yet another instance where colonial acquisition collides headlong with contemporary conscience.
A spokesperson for Sotheby’s defended the auction, stating that “due diligence” had been conducted regarding legality, authenticity, and provenance, and that the house had adhered to industry standards. But for many in the global Buddhist community, that’s cold comfort.
Professor John Strong, a religious scholar consulted by the Peppé family, tried to thread the needle: “These relics can be interpreted in multiple ways — as offerings, as symbols, as manifestations of Buddhahood. But either way, they are more than mere objects.”
And that, perhaps, is the heart of the matter. For a tradition steeped in reverence, non-attachment, and the sacredness of legacy, the idea of spiritual relics being hawked to the highest bidder is enough to make even the most serene monk boil over.
In short, while Sotheby’s may well go ahead and knock down the hammer, the moral reckoning may ring louder than any gavel ever could.
Also Read
What's Your Reaction?
